<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rich Bruchal &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rich.bruchal.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rich.bruchal.com</link>
	<description>My personal and professional soapbox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Times Reader</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2007/04/01/times-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2007/04/01/times-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a little late to the party, but today I downloaded and tried Times Reader, the standalone application that downloads and displays the New York Times.
At first blush, I like it a lot. It took a long time to download, mostly because it uses .NET 3.0, which I didn&#8217;t have on my XP machine (it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to the party, but today I downloaded and tried <a href="http://firstlook.nytimes.com/index.php?cat=4">Times Reader</a>, the standalone application that downloads and displays the New York Times.</p>
<p>At first blush, I like it a lot. It took a <i>long</i> time to download, mostly because it uses .NET 3.0, which I didn&#8217;t have on my XP machine (it&#8217;s a built in part of Vista though), and therefore had to be downloaded. And it also took a while to populate (it archives a weeks worth of news). But once it was done, it was smooth sailing.</p>
<p>I think the main reason I like it is that it&#8217;s well laid out. It has sections and columns, just like you&#8217;d expect a &#8220;real&#8221; newspaper to have. There&#8217;s a front page, which seems to correspond more or less to the print edition&#8217;s front page, and each section (Sports, Business, etc.) also has a page. Each is laid out something like a traditional newspaper &#8211; in columns, with the size and position of the headline being a visual indication of the &#8220;importance&#8221; of the story. Pictures and graphics are positioned like they would be in print as well. There&#8217;s an aesthetic there that&#8217;s somehow missing from most online news. And the display is very nice &#8211; crisp and clear. All this makes for an experience more like reading a traditional newspaper, but with the advantages of being online. Which is exactly what I&#8217;ve been looking for. I like the convenience of getting my news online, but I miss the structure and organization of a traditional newspaper, as opposed to the constant linear flow of articles that you tend to see online.</p>
<p>Of course, time will tell if it works well for me or not. It&#8217;s free for me, since I already subscribe to the print edition. I&#8217;m bummed that it&#8217;s not available on OS X, my primary OS at home. I&#8217;ve heard that Microsoft is working on a cross platform version of WPF (and some other parts of the .NET CLR) and that when it&#8217;s available, the Times will port the Reader. We&#8217;ll see if <i>that</i> ever works out. But so far, it&#8217;s great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2007/04/01/times-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Original Star Trek Gets Upgraded</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/09/16/original-star-trek-gets-upgraded/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/09/16/original-star-trek-gets-upgraded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original Star Trek Gets Upgraded: &#8220;Kiss the miniature Enterprise model goodbye: CBS is releasing digitally remastered episodes of the beloved 1960s TV series. Will modern, computer-generated special effects leave fans beaming?

My guess is no. Look at the backlash against George Lucas when he &#8220;updated&#8217; Star Wars.
(Via Wired News: Top Stories.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/topheadlines/~3/22768844/0,71798-0.html">Original Star Trek Gets Upgraded</a>: &#8220;Kiss the miniature Enterprise model goodbye: CBS is releasing digitally remastered episodes of the beloved 1960s TV series. Will modern, computer-generated special effects leave fans beaming?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My guess is no. Look at the backlash against George Lucas when he &#8220;updated&#8217; Star Wars.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.wired.com/">Wired News: Top Stories</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/09/16/original-star-trek-gets-upgraded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law &amp; Order &amp; Muppets</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/07/25/law-order-muppets/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/07/25/law-order-muppets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law &#038; Order &#038; Muppets: &#8220;


It&#8217;s not the same as an invisible Snuffleupagus, but there is something very exciting happening with Sesame Street.  On August 14, a segment called &#8216;Law and Order Special Letters Unit&#8217; will premiere, starting with &#8216;The Missing M.&#8217;  Hal Boedeker at the Orlando Sentinel reports that the actual cast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gothamist05/~3/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gothamist.com%2Farchives%2F2006%2F07%2F25%2Flaw_order_muppe.php">Law &#038; Order &#038; Muppets</a>: &#8220;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ssaGUejeEho"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ssaGUejeEho" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>
<img alt="2006_07_letterm.jpg" src="http://www.gothamist.com/attachments/jen/2006_07_letterm.jpg" width="163" height="105" align="left" hspace="5" />It&#8217;s not the same as an invisible <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloysius_Snuffleupagus">Snuffleupagus</a>, but there is something very exciting happening with Sesame Street.  On August 14, a segment called &#8216;Law and Order Special Letters Unit&#8217; will premiere, starting with &#8216;The Missing M.&#8217;  Hal Boedeker at the Orlando Sentinel reports that <a href="http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2006/07/lo_special_lett.html">the actual cast voices will be used</a>, and Dick Wolf himself said, &#8216;I feel like a tobacco company executive, because hopefully we will hook 4- and 5- and 6-year-olds on the brand now.&#8217;  A Sesame Street press release says that there&#8217;s definitely a Richard Belzer muppet and that plot includes detectives finding &#8216;things that start with the letter &#8216;M&#8217; such as a cow named Murray that makes mmooo sounds.&#8217;  Hmm, Law &#038; Order:  Playground Control Team, anyone?  And as we did some searching, we found this cool video of &#8216;Law &#038; Order:  Special Muppets Unit&#8217; on YouTube!</p>
<p>And the Muppets Wiki noted when Detective Lennie Briscoe (RIP, Jerry!) <a href="http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Law_&#038;_Order">mentioned Sesame Street</a>.
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/07/25/law_order_muppe.php#comments">Comment</a></p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/gothamist05?a=iMV8Yy"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/gothamist05?i=iMV8Yy" border="0"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gothamist05/~4/5415085"/>&#8221;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.gothamist.com/">Gothamist</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/07/25/law-order-muppets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simpsons live-action video a marketing campaign</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/13/simpsons-live-action-video-a-marketing-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/13/simpsons-live-action-video-a-marketing-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simpsons live-action video a marketing campaign: &#8221;
This way cool live-action version of the opening
sequence of The Simpsons might be a little less cool now that we know what it&#8217;s about. It turns out, the video
is part of a viral marketing
campaign by UK broadcasting network, Sky. The network and its ad agency created the dead-on, live-action [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/03/13/simpsons-live-action-video-a-marketing-campaign/">Simpsons live-action video a marketing campaign</a>: &#8221;</p>
<blockquote><div id="pc598931"><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/03/04/simpsons-opening-sequence-done-with-live-actors/"><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="1" align="right" alt="live action simpsons sky"<br />
src="http://www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/03/simpsonhjsj.gif" />This way cool</a> live-action version of the opening<br />
sequence of <em>The Simpsons</em> might be a little less cool now that we know what it&#8217;s about. It turns out, the video<br />
is part of a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/new_media/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002155794">viral marketing<br />
campaign</a> by UK broadcasting network, Sky. The network and its ad agency created the dead-on, live-action video as<br />
part of an on-air promotion for <em>The Simpsons</em>. They even had the blessings of <em>Simpsons</em> producers and<br />
creator Matt Groening. The ad gurus thought it was so cool that they decided to launch it on the internet and just let<br />
word-of-mouth go to work for them. Obviously, they were successful. The video is huge right now. And, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/02/17/nbc-clamps-down-on-lazy-sunday-videos/">unlike NBC</a>, Sky has no plans to<br />
pull it from the &#8216;net.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I had a feeling it was something like that. the effects are too good for someone random Joe to have made in iMovie.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com">TV Squad</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/13/simpsons-live-action-video-a-marketing-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Torn-Up Credit Card Experiment</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/12/the-torn-up-credit-card-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/12/the-torn-up-credit-card-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Torn-Up Credit Card Experiment: &#8220;Chase issues a Mastercard to taped-up card applications for another address [via]&#8216;&#8221;

This is not good. Apparently, this guy tried an experiment where he tried to mimic someone finding a credit card application in your trash and using it to get credit in your name.
He tore up a credit card application [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.cockeyed.com/citizen/creditcard/application.shtml">The Torn-Up Credit Card Experiment</a>: &#8220;Chase issues a Mastercard to taped-up card applications for another address [<a href="http://del.icio.us/revgeorge">via</a>]&#8216;&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is not good. Apparently, this guy tried an experiment where he tried to mimic someone finding a credit card application in your trash and using it to get credit in your name.</p>
<p>He tore up a credit card application he received in the mail, taped it back together again, changed the address to a different one and used a different phone number (his cell phone number). He got the card. Oy.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.waxy.org/links/">Waxy.org Links</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/12/the-torn-up-credit-card-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Feet Under surfaces on Bravo</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/11/six-feet-under-surfaces-on-bravo/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/11/six-feet-under-surfaces-on-bravo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six Feet Under surfaces on Bravo:
Bravo has the exclusive rights
to air all 63 episodes of the HBO hit series, Six Feet Under. Bravo says it&#8217;ll start airing the entire series
sometime this year, possibly this fall, although the announcement doesn&#8217;t give an exact date. HBO
refuses to say exactly how much the syndication deal is worth but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/03/11/six-feet-under-surfaces-on-bravo/">Six Feet Under surfaces on Bravo</a>:</p>
<blockquote><div id="pc598594"><img width="250" height="159" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/03/sixfeetunder.jpg" alt="six feet under bravo" />Bravo has the exclusive rights<br />
to air all 63 episodes of the HBO hit series, <em>Six Feet Under</em>. Bravo says it&#8217;ll start airing the entire series<br />
sometime this year, possibly this fall, although the <a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/cgi/pr.cgi?id=20060310bravo01">announcement</a> doesn&#8217;t give an exact date. HBO<br />
refuses to say exactly how much the syndication deal is worth but <a href="http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,18542,00.html">this report</a> puts it at $15 million, or $250,000 an<br />
episode. HBO originally pimped out <em>Six Feet Under</em> for $450,000 but that was a little too rich for other<br />
networks&#8217; blood. As with <em>Sex and the City</em>, HBO has given Bravo the go-ahead to clean up the language and<br />
video.</div>
<p>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>I loved Six Feet Under (the series finale was one of the best ever), but I wonder how some of this stuff can be cleaned up for non-HBO TV.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com">TV Squad</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/03/11/six-feet-under-surfaces-on-bravo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kids, Don&#8217;t Text And Drive</title>
		<link>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/02/20/kids-dont-text-and-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/02/20/kids-dont-text-and-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rich.bruchal.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Severed arm found near accident still clutching cellphone
Not that it&#8217;s proof of blame or anything
but a woman recently veered her truck into the median, over-corrected, and then flipped her vehicle several times
before coming to rest &#8212; minus her cellphone which was found still clutched in the hand of her severed arm nearby. What
have we learned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/20/severed-arm-found-near-accident-still-clutching-cellphone/">Severed arm found near accident still clutching cellphone</a></p>
<blockquote><div id="pc592680"><a href="http://www.wlextv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4449021" target=_blank class=blines3 title="Link outside of this blog"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"src="http://www.engadget.com/media/2006/02/5618372271648037.jpg" alt="" /></a>Not that it&#8217;s proof of blame or anything<br />
but a woman recently veered her truck into the median, over-corrected, and then flipped her vehicle several times<br />
before coming to rest &#8212; minus her cellphone which was found still clutched in the hand of her severed arm nearby. What<br />
have we learned oh gentle readers? Well, she was either blabbing into her cellphone which caused the horrific crash<br />
thereby supporting <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/12/new-study-says-headsets-dont-make-cellphone-driving-safer/" target=_blank class=blines3 title="Link outside of this blog">study</a> after <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/12/16/driver-cellphone-usage-on-the-rise/" target=_blank class=blines3 title="Link outside of this blog">study</a> warning of such dangers. Or<br />
perhaps the torque created at impact while presumably holding a <a href="http://cellphones.engadget.com/search/?q=DynaTac" target=_blank class=blines3 title="Link outside of this blog">DynaTac</a> was just a bit too much for the old ball-and-socket<br />
to bear. Folks, stay safe and upgrade often, mkay?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Eeeew.  I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;ve got my Bluetooth headset.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com">Engadget Mobile</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rich.bruchal.com/2006/02/20/kids-dont-text-and-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

